LensReading which lens this session carries.
SC2B-1002Auto-clearedmedium materiality

Supply plan at execute

Rafael Costa

Supply Chain · Supply Planning · SC2B Constraint Resolution

$83k

value

87%

confidence

18

people affected

1h 8m

age

2h 45m

sla

100%

progress

Currently held by

Supply Planning Orchestrator

An agent owns the next move

Raised by

Kofi Ito

Requester of record

At station

Execute

Workflow layer · station 5 of 5

Where this train is on the line

SC2BConstraint ResolutionTransactional · 5 stations

Detect shortage

25 q

Model options

40 q

Auto-expedite in-policy

24 q

Escalate cost

9 q

Execute

1 live

Evidence trail

Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind

This is the readable trail.

  1. Cleared detect shortage

    -68m

    Capacity Balancing Agent

    Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached

  2. Cleared model options

    -54m

    Constraint Detection Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  3. Cleared auto-expedite in-policy

    -41m

    Capacity Balancing Agent

    Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached

  4. Cleared escalate cost

    -27m

    Director, Supply Planning

    Approval recorded with rationale and policy clause cited

  5. Holding at execute

    -14m

    Expedite Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

What happens next

The next station and its rule

This is the last station.

Why the signal is what it is

Derived from time against commitment, not from the state

Green. This item is still inside the time it was committed to, and it is not close enough to that line for its materiality to pull it forward. Green says nothing about who holds it: an item can be green and sitting with a person.

clock 1h 8m against a commitment of 2h 45m · 41% of the time used
materiality medium · blast radius 18 records or people downstream
state auto-cleared — held separately, and deliberately not part of this reading