LensReading which lens this session carries.
SC2A-1034Evidence postedmedium materiality

Supply plan at detect constraints

Amara Lindqvist

Supply Chain · Supply Planning · SC2A Supply Plan Cycle

$66k

value

81%

confidence

39

people affected

39m

age

2h 10m

sla

43%

progress

Currently held by

Capacity Balancing Agent

An agent owns the next move

Raised by

Farrah Bianchi

Requester of record

At station

Detect constraints

Workflow layer · station 3 of 7

Where this train is on the line

SC2ASupply Plan CycleTransactional · 7 stations

Explode requirements

46 q

Balance capacity

4 q

Detect constraints

1 live

Draft plan

36 q

Planner review

0 q

Commit

29 q

Release to suppliers

27 q

Evidence trail

Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind

This is the readable trail.

  1. Cleared explode requirements

    -39m

    Capacity Balancing Agent

    Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached

  2. Cleared balance capacity

    -26m

    Capacity Balancing Agent

    Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached

  3. Holding at detect constraints

    -13m

    Material Requirements Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

What happens next

The next station and its rule

Draft plan

run by Supplier Commit Agent · Workflow layer

No gate here. The agent clears this station inside its envelope and posts evidence.

Why the signal is what it is

Derived from time against commitment, not from the state

Green. This item is still inside the time it was committed to, and it is not close enough to that line for its materiality to pull it forward. Green says nothing about who holds it: an item can be green and sitting with a person.

clock 39m against a commitment of 2h 10m · 30% of the time used
materiality medium · blast radius 39 records or people downstream
state evidence-posted — held separately, and deliberately not part of this reading