LensReading which lens this session carries.
SC10B-1009Evidence postedlow materiality

Network study at business case

Ethan Tanaka

Supply Chain · Network Design · SC10B Footprint Change

$13k

value

69%

confidence

37

people affected

3h 14m

age

4h 45m

sla

50%

progress

Currently held by

Network Modeling Agent

An agent owns the next move

Raised by

Clara Nakamura

Requester of record

At station

Business case

Workflow layer · station 3 of 6

Where this train is on the line

SC10BFootprint ChangeTransactional · 6 stations

Approve study

7 q

Model impact

31 q

Business case

1 live

Board approve

3 q

Sequence

29 q

Execute

28 q

Evidence trail

Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind

This is the readable trail.

  1. Cleared approve study

    -194m

    VP Supply Chain Strategy

    Approval recorded with rationale and policy clause cited

  2. Cleared model impact

    -129m

    Cost-to-Serve Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  3. Holding at business case

    -65m

    Footprint Scenario Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

What happens next

The next station and its rule

Board approve

run by VP Supply Chain Strategy · Policy layer

Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the network study decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.

approver VP Supply Chain Strategy

Why the signal is what it is

Derived from time against commitment, not from the state

Green. This item is still inside the time it was committed to, and it is not close enough to that line for its materiality to pull it forward. Green says nothing about who holds it: an item can be green and sitting with a person.

clock 3h 14m against a commitment of 4h 45m · 68% of the time used
materiality low · blast radius 37 records or people downstream
state evidence-posted — held separately, and deliberately not part of this reading