Submission at compare to model

Marcus Delgado

Revenue Growth Management · Forecast Integrity · RO9A Weekly Integrity Check

$1.9m

value

86%

confidence

people affected

1d 2h

age

17h 22m

sla

40%

progress

Currently held by

Integrity Policy Agent

An agent owns the next move

Raised by

Ines Farouk

Requester of record

At station

Compare to model

Workflow layer · station 2 of 5

Where this train is on the line

RO9AWeekly Integrity CheckAnalytical · 5 stations

Ingest submissions

18 q

Compare to model

1 live

Score accuracy

6 q

Flag pattern

38 q

Leader readout

2 q

Evidence trail

Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind

Auditor pack

This is the readable trail. more

Cleared ingest submissions
-1616m
Submission Compliance Agent
Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached
Holding at compare to model
-808m
Model vs Commit Agent
Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

What happens next

The next station and its rule

Score accuracy

run by Historical Accuracy Agent · Workflow layer

No gate here. The agent clears this station inside its envelope and posts evidence.

Why the signal is what it is

Derived from time against commitment, not from the state

Red. This item is past the time it was committed to and it is either high or critical materiality or wide enough downstream to matter. Red says nothing about who holds it: an item can be red and still be moving through an agent that has not stopped.

clock 1d 2h against a commitment of 17h 22m · 155% of the time used

materiality high · blast radius 14 records or people downstream

state in-flight — held separately, and deliberately not part of this reading

Past SLA by 9h 34m · 14 people or records downstream of this decision

Open the escalation lane