Change at verify

Rafael Voss

Revenue Growth Management · Systems & Integration · RO10B Schema Change Release

$7k

value

83%

confidence

people affected

1h 11m

age

51m

sla

100%

progress

Currently held by

Sandbox Refresh Agent

An agent owns the next move

Raised by

Marcus Muller

Requester of record

At station

Verify

Workflow layer · station 7 of 7

Where this train is on the line

RO10BSchema Change ReleaseTransactional · 7 stations

Request

26 q

Impact scan

41 q

Build

13 q

Test

23 q

Change board approve

8 q

Deploy

17 q

Verify

1 live

Evidence trail

Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind

Auditor pack

This is the readable trail. more

Cleared build
-71m
Schema Change Agent
Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log
Cleared test
-57m
Sandbox Refresh Agent
Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log
Cleared change board approve
-43m
Director, Revenue Systems
Approval recorded with rationale and policy clause cited
Cleared deploy
-28m
Systems Policy Agent
Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log
Holding at verify
-14m
Revenue Systems Orchestrator
Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

What happens next

The next station and its rule

This is the last station. more

Why the signal is what it is

Derived from time against commitment, not from the state

Amber. Either this item is at or past the time it was committed to and is not material enough to escalate, or it is inside the time but has burned three quarters of it while carrying high or critical materiality. Amber says nothing about who holds it: an item can be amber and moving normally through an agent.

clock 1h 11m against a commitment of 51m · 139% of the time used

materiality low · blast radius 37 records or people downstream

state evidence-posted — held separately, and deliberately not part of this reading

Past SLA by 20m · 37 people or records downstream of this decision