LensReading which lens this session carries.
RD9B-1038Evidence postedmedium materiality

Collaboration at log

Victor Tanaka

Research & Development · External Collaboration · RD9B Data Sharing Request

$51k

value

69%

confidence

29

people affected

6m

age

1h 2m

sla

100%

progress

Currently held by

GBS spine

Running in the shared AI GBS spine

Raised by

Anika Mensah

Requester of record

At station

Log

AI GBS layer · station 6 of 6

Where this train is on the line

RD9BData Sharing RequestTransactional · 6 stations

Request

45 q

Classify sensitivity

5 q

Privacy check

8 q

Approve

9 q

Share

36 q

Log

1 live

Evidence trail

Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind

This is the readable trail.

  1. Cleared classify sensitivity

    -6m

    Agreement Coordination Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  2. Cleared privacy check

    -5m

    Director, External Innovation

    Approval recorded with rationale and policy clause cited

  3. Cleared approve

    -4m

    Director, External Innovation

    Approval recorded with rationale and policy clause cited

  4. Cleared share

    -2m

    Data Sharing Agent

    Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached

  5. Holding at log

    -1m

    Publication Review Agent

    Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached

What happens next

The next station and its rule

This is the last station.

Why the signal is what it is

Derived from time against commitment, not from the state

Green. This item is still inside the time it was committed to, and it is not close enough to that line for its materiality to pull it forward. Green says nothing about who holds it: an item can be green and sitting with a person.

clock 6m against a commitment of 1h 2m · 10% of the time used
materiality medium · blast radius 29 records or people downstream
state evidence-posted — held separately, and deliberately not part of this reading