LensReading which lens this session carries.
RD6B-1040Evidence postedmedium materiality

Prototype at scale decision

Naomi Ferreira

Research & Development · Prototype & Pilot · RD6B Pilot Deployment

$91k

value

74%

confidence

26

people affected

1h 3m

age

2h 15m

sla

100%

progress

Currently held by

Feedback Synthesis Agent

An agent owns the next move

Raised by

Pierre Voss

Requester of record

At station

Scale decision

Policy layer · station 6 of 6

Where this train is on the line

RD6BPilot DeploymentTransactional · 6 stations

Select site

10 q

Prepare

44 q

Approve pilot

6 q

Run

43 q

Measure

5 q

Scale decision

1 live

Evidence trail

Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind

This is the readable trail.

  1. Cleared prepare

    -63m

    Test Plan Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  2. Cleared approve pilot

    -50m

    Director, Product Development

    Approval recorded with rationale and policy clause cited

  3. Cleared run

    -38m

    Pilot Site Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  4. Cleared measure

    -25m

    Build Planning Agent

    Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached

  5. Holding at scale decision

    -13m

    Director, Product Development

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

What happens next

The next station and its rule

This is the last station.

Why the signal is what it is

Derived from time against commitment, not from the state

Green. This item is still inside the time it was committed to, and it is not close enough to that line for its materiality to pull it forward. Green says nothing about who holds it: an item can be green and sitting with a person.

clock 1h 3m against a commitment of 2h 15m · 47% of the time used
materiality medium · blast radius 26 records or people downstream
state evidence-posted — held separately, and deliberately not part of this reading