LensReading which lens this session carries.
RD6B-1034In flightlow materiality

Prototype at approve pilot

Callum Ito

Research & Development · Prototype & Pilot · RD6B Pilot Deployment

$8k

value

89%

confidence

6

people affected

17h 57m

age

11h 30m

sla

50%

progress

Currently held by

Build Planning Agent

An agent owns the next move

Raised by

Naomi Okafor

Requester of record

At station

Approve pilot

Policy layer · station 3 of 6

Where this train is on the line

RD6BPilot DeploymentTransactional · 6 stations

Select site

10 q

Prepare

44 q

Approve pilot

1 live

Run

43 q

Measure

5 q

Scale decision

3 q

Evidence trail

Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind

This is the readable trail.

  1. Cleared select site

    -1077m

    Build Planning Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  2. Cleared prepare

    -718m

    Test Plan Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  3. Holding at approve pilot

    -359m

    Director, Product Development

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

What happens next

The next station and its rule

Run

run by Pilot Site Agent · Workflow layer

No gate here. The agent clears this station inside its envelope and posts evidence.

Why the signal is what it is

Derived from time against commitment, not from the state

Amber. Either this item is at or past the time it was committed to and is not material enough to escalate, or it is inside the time but has burned three quarters of it while carrying high or critical materiality. Amber says nothing about who holds it: an item can be amber and moving normally through an agent.

clock 17h 57m against a commitment of 11h 30m · 156% of the time used
materiality low · blast radius 6 records or people downstream
state in-flight — held separately, and deliberately not part of this reading

Past SLA by 6h 27m · 6 people or records downstream of this decision