LensReading which lens this session carries.
RD4C-1008Evidence postedlow materiality

Lab request at calibrate

Rafael Marchetti

Research & Development · Lab Operations · RD4C Calibration Cycle

$34k

value

75%

confidence

29

people affected

1h 27m

age

2h 32m

sla

50%

progress

Currently held by

Consumables Agent

An agent owns the next move

Raised by

Talia Duarte

Requester of record

At station

Calibrate

Workflow layer · station 3 of 6

Where this train is on the line

RD4CCalibration CycleTransactional · 6 stations

Detect due

27 q

Schedule

24 q

Calibrate

1 live

Technician sign

4 q

Record

15 q

Certify

30 q

Evidence trail

Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind

This is the readable trail.

  1. Cleared detect due

    -87m

    Scheduling Agent

    Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached

  2. Cleared schedule

    -58m

    Scheduling Agent

    Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached

  3. Holding at calibrate

    -29m

    Instrument Health Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

What happens next

The next station and its rule

Technician sign

run by Director, Laboratory Operations · Policy layer

Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the lab request decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.

approver Director, Laboratory Operations

Why the signal is what it is

Derived from time against commitment, not from the state

Green. This item is still inside the time it was committed to, and it is not close enough to that line for its materiality to pull it forward. Green says nothing about who holds it: an item can be green and sitting with a person.

clock 1h 27m against a commitment of 2h 32m · 57% of the time used
materiality low · blast radius 29 records or people downstream
state evidence-posted — held separately, and deliberately not part of this reading