LensReading which lens this session carries.
RD3B-1025Auto-clearedmedium materiality

Protocol at document

Priya Ellery

Research & Development · Experiment Design · RD3B Protocol Deviation

$47k

value

93%

confidence

6

people affected

41m

age

30m

sla

100%

progress

Currently held by

C2L spine

Running in the shared AI GBS spine

Raised by

Simon Sandoval

Requester of record

At station

Document

AI GBS layer · station 5 of 5

Where this train is on the line

RD3BProtocol DeviationTransactional · 5 stations

Detect

10 q

Classify

21 q

Assess validity impact

8 q

Scientist decide

9 q

Document

1 live

Evidence trail

Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind

This is the readable trail.

  1. Cleared detect

    -41m

    Protocol Drafting Agent

    Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached

  2. Cleared classify

    -33m

    Power Analysis Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  3. Cleared assess validity impact

    -25m

    Control Design Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  4. Cleared scientist decide

    -16m

    Director, Research Methods

    Approval recorded with rationale and policy clause cited

  5. Holding at document

    -8m

    Protocol Drafting Agent

    Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached

What happens next

The next station and its rule

This is the last station.

Why the signal is what it is

Derived from time against commitment, not from the state

Amber. Either this item is at or past the time it was committed to and is not material enough to escalate, or it is inside the time but has burned three quarters of it while carrying high or critical materiality. Amber says nothing about who holds it: an item can be amber and moving normally through an agent.

clock 41m against a commitment of 30m · 137% of the time used
materiality medium · blast radius 6 records or people downstream
state auto-cleared — held separately, and deliberately not part of this reading

Past SLA by 11m · 6 people or records downstream of this decision