Protocol at assess validity impact
Tomas Petrov
Research & Development · Experiment Design · RD3B Protocol Deviation
$42k
value
87%
confidence
12
people affected
4h 15m
age
3h 8m
sla
60%
progress
Currently held by
Design Policy Agent
An agent owns the next move
Raised by
Clara Kaplan
Requester of record
At station
Assess validity impact
Workflow layer · station 3 of 5
Where this train is on the line
Evidence trail
Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind
This is the readable trail. more
Cleared detect
-255mProtocol Drafting Agent
Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached
Cleared classify
-170mPower Analysis Agent
Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log
Holding at assess validity impact
-85mControl Design Agent
Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log
What happens next
The next station and its rule
Scientist decide
run by Director, Research Methods · Policy layer
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the protocol decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
approver Director, Research Methods
Why the signal is what it is
Derived from time against commitment, not from the state
Amber. Either this item is at or past the time it was committed to and is not material enough to escalate, or it is inside the time but has burned three quarters of it while carrying high or critical materiality. Amber says nothing about who holds it: an item can be amber and moving normally through an agent.
Past SLA by 1h 7m · 12 people or records downstream of this decision