LensReading which lens this session carries.
RD10C-1000Evidence postedmedium materiality

Candidate at draft finding

Amara Ferreira

Research & Development · Technology Scouting · RD10C Technical Diligence

$86k

value

75%

confidence

29

people affected

4h 46m

age

5h 4m

sla

80%

progress

Currently held by

Build-Buy-Partner Agent

An agent owns the next move

Raised by

Jonas Marchetti

Requester of record

At station

Draft finding

Workflow layer · station 4 of 5

Where this train is on the line

RD10CTechnical DiligenceTransactional · 5 stations

Scope

33 q

Assemble evidence

6 q

Assess

28 q

Draft finding

1 live

Leader review

3 q

Evidence trail

Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind

This is the readable trail. The same actions are held in the append-only evidence spine with their authority grant, version stamps and hash links; open the auditor pack to see them.

  1. Cleared scope

    -286m

    Landscape Monitoring Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  2. Cleared assemble evidence

    -215m

    Startup Screening Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  3. Cleared assess

    -143m

    Capability Match Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  4. Holding at draft finding

    -72m

    Build-Buy-Partner Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

What happens next

The next station and its rule

Leader review

run by Director, Technology Scouting · Policy layer

Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the candidate decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.

approver Director, Technology Scouting

Why the signal is what it is

Plain reading of the current state

Amber. The agent completed the work but the outcome fell into a sampling band, so it posted evidence for review rather than closing silently. Work carries on; a human confirms after the fact.