LensReading which lens this session carries.
RD10A-1021Evidence postedhigh materiality

Candidate at engage

Talia Muller

Research & Development · Technology Scouting · RD10A Scouting Cycle

$1.8m

value

80%

confidence

7

people affected

6h 13m

age

4h 26m

sla

100%

progress

Currently held by

Build-Buy-Partner Agent

An agent owns the next move

Raised by

Lukas Sandoval

Requester of record

At station

Engage

Workflow layer · station 6 of 6

Where this train is on the line

RD10AScouting CycleAnalytical · 6 stations

Scan landscape

24 q

Screen candidates

21 q

Match to needs

22 q

Draft shortlist

9 q

Leader review

3 q

Engage

1 live

Evidence trail

Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind

This is the readable trail.

  1. Cleared screen candidates

    -373m

    Landscape Monitoring Agent

    Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached

  2. Cleared match to needs

    -298m

    Capability Match Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  3. Cleared draft shortlist

    -224m

    Build-Buy-Partner Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  4. Cleared leader review

    -149m

    Director, Technology Scouting

    Approval recorded with rationale and policy clause cited

  5. Holding at engage

    -75m

    Technology Scouting Orchestrator

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

What happens next

The next station and its rule

This is the last station.

Why the signal is what it is

Derived from time against commitment, not from the state

Red. This item is past the time it was committed to and it is either high or critical materiality or wide enough downstream to matter. Red says nothing about who holds it: an item can be red and still be moving through an agent that has not stopped.

clock 6h 13m against a commitment of 4h 26m · 140% of the time used
materiality high · blast radius 7 records or people downstream
state evidence-posted — held separately, and deliberately not part of this reading

Past SLA by 1h 47m · 7 people or records downstream of this decision

Open the escalation lane