LensReading which lens this session carries.
LG9C-1055Evidence postedlow materiality

Privacy case at detect

Farrah Kaplan

Legal · Privacy & Data Protection · LG9C Breach Response

$27k

value

72%

confidence

35

people affected

5h 3m

age

4h 17m

sla

14%

progress

Currently held by

Breach Triage Agent

An agent owns the next move

Raised by

Bruno Tanaka

Requester of record

At station

Detect

Workflow layer · station 1 of 7

Where this train is on the line

LG9CBreach ResponseTransactional · 7 stations

Detect

1 live

Triage severity

11 q

Contain

28 q

Assess notifiability

7 q

Regulator notify

3 q

Subject notify

6 q

Post-mortem

42 q

Evidence trail

Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind

This is the readable trail.

  1. Holding at detect

    -303m

    Data Subject Request Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

What happens next

The next station and its rule

Triage severity

run by Processing Register Agent · Workflow layer

No gate here. The agent clears this station inside its envelope and posts evidence.

Why the signal is what it is

Derived from time against commitment, not from the state

Amber. Either this item is at or past the time it was committed to and is not material enough to escalate, or it is inside the time but has burned three quarters of it while carrying high or critical materiality. Amber says nothing about who holds it: an item can be amber and moving normally through an agent.

clock 5h 3m against a commitment of 4h 17m · 118% of the time used
materiality low · blast radius 35 records or people downstream
state evidence-posted — held separately, and deliberately not part of this reading

Past SLA by 46m · 35 people or records downstream of this decision