LensReading which lens this session carries.
LG9B-1028Human holdlow materiality

Privacy case at draft assessment

Maeve Kaplan

Legal · Privacy & Data Protection · LG9B Privacy Impact Assessment

$27k

value

64%

confidence

91

people affected

25m

age

2h 59m

sla

43%

progress

Currently held by

Data Protection Officer

A person owns the next move

Raised by

Zara Costa

Requester of record

At station

Draft assessment

Workflow layer · station 3 of 7

Where this train is on the line

LG9BPrivacy Impact AssessmentTransactional · 7 stations

Trigger

9 q

Scope

21 q

Draft assessment

1 live

Privacy review

5 q

Mitigations

2 q

Sign

5 q

Register

37 q

Evidence trail

Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind

This is the readable trail.

  1. Cleared trigger

    -25m

    Data Subject Request Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  2. Cleared scope

    -17m

    Processing Register Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  3. Holding at draft assessment

    -8m

    Impact Assessment Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

What happens next

The next station and its rule

Privacy review

run by Data Protection Officer · Policy layer

Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the privacy case decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.

approver Data Protection Officer

Why the signal is what it is

Derived from time against commitment, not from the state

Green. This item is still inside the time it was committed to, and it is not close enough to that line for its materiality to pull it forward. Green says nothing about who holds it: an item can be green and sitting with a person.

clock 25m against a commitment of 2h 59m · 14% of the time used
materiality low · blast radius 91 records or people downstream
state human-hold — held separately, and deliberately not part of this reading