LensReading which lens this session carries.
IT6C-1002In flightlow materiality

Application change at business owner approve

Daniel Lindqvist

Information Technology · Application Management · IT6C Application Retirement

$32k

value

84%

confidence

28

people affected

17h 5m

age

8h 59m

sla

50%

progress

Currently held by

Application Management Orchestrator

An agent owns the next move

Raised by

Idris Petrov

Requester of record

At station

Business owner approve

Policy layer · station 3 of 6

Where this train is on the line

IT6CApplication RetirementTransactional · 6 stations

Detect obsolescence

0 q

Map dependencies

15 q

Business owner approve

1 live

Migrate

38 q

Decommission

38 q

Archive

38 q

Evidence trail

Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind

This is the readable trail.

  1. Cleared detect obsolescence

    -1025m

    Vendor Escalation Agent

    Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached

  2. Cleared map dependencies

    -683m

    Release Coordination Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  3. Holding at business owner approve

    -342m

    Director, Application Services

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

What happens next

The next station and its rule

Migrate

run by Vendor Escalation Agent · Workflow layer

No gate here. The agent clears this station inside its envelope and posts evidence.

Why the signal is what it is

Derived from time against commitment, not from the state

Amber. Either this item is at or past the time it was committed to and is not material enough to escalate, or it is inside the time but has burned three quarters of it while carrying high or critical materiality. Amber says nothing about who holds it: an item can be amber and moving normally through an agent.

clock 17h 5m against a commitment of 8h 59m · 190% of the time used
materiality low · blast radius 28 records or people downstream
state in-flight — held separately, and deliberately not part of this reading

Past SLA by 8h 6m · 28 people or records downstream of this decision