LensReading which lens this session carries.
IT2C-1035In flightmedium materiality

Access request at justify

Owen Tanaka

Information Technology · Identity & Access · IT2C Privileged Access Request

$49k

value

89%

confidence

24

people affected

4h 46m

age

2h 18m

sla

29%

progress

Currently held by

Mover Adjustment Agent

An agent owns the next move

Raised by

Wren Lindqvist

Requester of record

At station

Justify

Workflow layer · station 2 of 7

Where this train is on the line

IT2CPrivileged Access RequestTransactional · 7 stations

Request

40 q

Justify

1 live

Duty check

19 q

Owner approve

3 q

Grant time-boxed

25 q

Auto-revoke

28 q

Log

24 q

Evidence trail

Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind

This is the readable trail.

  1. Cleared request

    -286m

    Joiner Provisioning Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  2. Holding at justify

    -143m

    Mover Adjustment Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

What happens next

The next station and its rule

Duty check

run by Joiner Provisioning Agent · AI GBS layer

No gate here. The agent clears this station inside its envelope and posts evidence.

Handed to the AI GBS depot

Why the signal is what it is

Derived from time against commitment, not from the state

Amber. Either this item is at or past the time it was committed to and is not material enough to escalate, or it is inside the time but has burned three quarters of it while carrying high or critical materiality. Amber says nothing about who holds it: an item can be amber and moving normally through an agent.

clock 4h 46m against a commitment of 2h 18m · 207% of the time used
materiality medium · blast radius 24 records or people downstream
state in-flight — held separately, and deliberately not part of this reading

Past SLA by 2h 28m · 24 people or records downstream of this decision