Automation at confirm

Elena Brennan

AI GBS & Global Business Services · Automation Factory · GB7B Regression Response

$51k

value

90%

confidence

people affected

2h 29m

age

1h 43m

sla

100%

progress

Currently held by

Regression Monitor Agent

An agent owns the next move

Raised by

Daniel Costa

Requester of record

At station

Confirm

Workflow layer · station 6 of 6

Where this train is on the line

GB7BRegression ResponseTransactional · 6 stations

Detect drift

40 q

Diagnose

33 q

Patch

0 q

Test

4 q

Redeploy

33 q

Confirm

1 live

Evidence trail

Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind

Auditor pack

This is the readable trail. more

Cleared diagnose
-149m
Feasibility Scoring Agent
Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log
Cleared patch
-119m
Build Agent
Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log
Cleared test
-89m
Test Harness Agent
Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log
Cleared redeploy
-60m
Test Harness Agent
Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached
Holding at confirm
-30m
Regression Monitor Agent
Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

What happens next

The next station and its rule

This is the last station. more

Why the signal is what it is

Derived from time against commitment, not from the state

Amber. Either this item is at or past the time it was committed to and is not material enough to escalate, or it is inside the time but has burned three quarters of it while carrying high or critical materiality. Amber says nothing about who holds it: an item can be amber and moving normally through an agent.

clock 2h 29m against a commitment of 1h 43m · 145% of the time used

materiality medium · blast radius 33 records or people downstream

state auto-cleared — held separately, and deliberately not part of this reading

Past SLA by 46m · 33 people or records downstream of this decision