Improvement at draft verdict
Aaron Ellery
AI GBS & Global Business Services · Continuous Improvement · GB10C Benefit Verification
$1.9m
value
97%
confidence
28
people affected
1h 57m
age
6h 23m
sla
80%
progress
Currently held by
Root Cause Agent
An agent owns the next move
Raised by
Hannah Sorensen
Requester of record
At station
Draft verdict
Workflow layer · station 4 of 5
Where this train is on the line
Evidence trail
Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind
This is the readable trail. more
Cleared pull baseline
-117mWaste Detection Agent
Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log
Cleared measure actual
-88mRoot Cause Agent
Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log
Cleared reconcile
-59mExperiment Design Agent
Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log
Holding at draft verdict
-29mBenefit Measurement Agent
Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log
What happens next
The next station and its rule
Ratify
run by Head of Continuous Improvement · Policy layer
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the improvement decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
approver Head of Continuous Improvement
Why the signal is what it is
Derived from time against commitment, not from the state
Green. This item is still inside the time it was committed to, and it is not close enough to that line for its materiality to pull it forward. Green says nothing about who holds it: an item can be green and sitting with a person.