Control test at retest
Ines Tanaka
Finance · Internal Controls & Audit Interlock · FI8A Control Test Cycle
$6k
value
86%
confidence
34
people affected
4h 45m
age
4h 38m
sla
88%
progress
Currently held by
R2R spine
Running in the shared AI GBS spine
Raised by
Rosa Costa
Requester of record
At station
Retest
AI GBS layer · station 7 of 8
Where this train is on the line
Evidence trail
Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind
This is the readable trail. more
Cleared execute test
-285mControl Testing Agent
Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached
Cleared score
-228mDuty Conflict Agent
Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log
Cleared deficiency raise
-171mDirector, Internal Controls
Approval recorded with rationale and policy clause cited
Cleared owner remediate
-114mControls Policy Agent
Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log
Holding at retest
-57mControl Testing Agent
Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached
What happens next
The next station and its rule
Sign
run by Director, Internal Controls · Policy layer
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the control test decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
approver Director, Internal Controls
Why the signal is what it is
Derived from time against commitment, not from the state
Amber. Either this item is at or past the time it was committed to and is not material enough to escalate, or it is inside the time but has burned three quarters of it while carrying high or critical materiality. Amber says nothing about who holds it: an item can be amber and moving normally through an agent.
Past SLA by 7m · 34 people or records downstream of this decision