Technical position at draft transition plan
Zara Voss
Finance · Controllership & Policy · FI5C Standards Change Response
$32k
value
67%
confidence
5
people affected
4h 10m
age
3h 35m
sla
60%
progress
Currently held by
Controllership Orchestrator
An agent owns the next move
Raised by
Daniel Kaplan
Requester of record
At station
Draft transition plan
Workflow layer · station 3 of 5
Where this train is on the line
Evidence trail
Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind
This is the readable trail. more
Cleared detect change
-250mControllership Orchestrator
Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached
Cleared assess impact
-167mTechnical Position Agent
Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log
Holding at draft transition plan
-83mStandards Watch Agent
Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log
What happens next
The next station and its rule
Controller approve
run by Chief Accounting Officer · Policy layer
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the technical position decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
approver Chief Accounting Officer
Why the signal is what it is
Derived from time against commitment, not from the state
Amber. Either this item is at or past the time it was committed to and is not material enough to escalate, or it is inside the time but has burned three quarters of it while carrying high or critical materiality. Amber says nothing about who holds it: an item can be amber and moving normally through an agent.
Past SLA by 35m · 5 people or records downstream of this decision