LensReading which lens this session carries.
FI4C-1028Evidence postedlow materiality

Close task at reviewer approve

Ines Tanaka

Finance · Record-to-Report & Close · FI4C Manual Journal

$12k

value

79%

confidence

21

people affected

8h 23m

age

11h 47m

sla

67%

progress

Currently held by

Accrual Agent

An agent owns the next move

Raised by

Mei Baptiste

Requester of record

At station

Reviewer approve

Policy layer · station 4 of 6

Where this train is on the line

FI4CManual JournalTransactional · 6 stations

Request

15 q

Validate support

17 q

Preparer submit

39 q

Reviewer approve

1 live

Post

40 q

Evidence

1 q

Evidence trail

Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind

This is the readable trail.

  1. Cleared request

    -503m

    Journal Entry Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  2. Cleared validate support

    -377m

    Journal Entry Agent

    Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached

  3. Cleared preparer submit

    -252m

    Intercompany Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  4. Holding at reviewer approve

    -126m

    Corporate Controller

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

What happens next

The next station and its rule

Post

run by Journal Entry Agent · AI GBS layer

No gate here. The agent clears this station inside its envelope and posts evidence.

Handed to the AI GBS depot

Why the signal is what it is

Derived from time against commitment, not from the state

Green. This item is still inside the time it was committed to, and it is not close enough to that line for its materiality to pull it forward. Green says nothing about who holds it: an item can be green and sitting with a person.

clock 8h 23m against a commitment of 11h 47m · 71% of the time used
materiality low · blast radius 21 records or people downstream
state evidence-posted — held separately, and deliberately not part of this reading