LensReading which lens this session carries.
FI2C-1036Human holdmedium materiality

Budget line at approve

Wren Kowalski

Finance · Budgeting & Forecasting · FI2C Reallocation Request

$84k

value

54%

confidence

4

people affected

36m

age

38m

sla

80%

progress

Currently held by

Director, Budgeting

A person owns the next move

Raised by

Nadia Tanaka

Requester of record

At station

Approve

Policy layer · station 4 of 5

Where this train is on the line

FI2CReallocation RequestTransactional · 5 stations

Request

16 q

Policy screen

44 q

Model impact

5 q

Approve

1 live

Apply

19 q

Evidence trail

Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind

This is the readable trail.

  1. Cleared request

    -36m

    Budget Build Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  2. Cleared policy screen

    -27m

    Budget Build Agent

    Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached

  3. Cleared model impact

    -18m

    Assumption Tracking Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  4. Holding at approve

    -9m

    Director, Budgeting

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

What happens next

The next station and its rule

Apply

run by Budget Build Agent · AI GBS layer

No gate here. The agent clears this station inside its envelope and posts evidence.

Handed to the AI GBS depot

Why the signal is what it is

Derived from time against commitment, not from the state

Green. This item is still inside the time it was committed to, and it is not close enough to that line for its materiality to pull it forward. Green says nothing about who holds it: an item can be green and sitting with a person.

clock 36m against a commitment of 38m · 95% of the time used
materiality medium · blast radius 4 records or people downstream
state human-hold — held separately, and deliberately not part of this reading