Test run at flag regression

Ethan Baptiste

Engineering · Test & Assurance · EN5C Performance Baseline

$70k

value

80%

confidence

people affected

4h 11m

age

3h 18m

sla

75%

progress

Currently held by

Test Data Agent

An agent owns the next move

Raised by

Idris Voss

Requester of record

At station

Flag regression

Policy layer · station 3 of 4

Where this train is on the line

EN5CPerformance BaselineTransactional · 4 stations

Run load

28 q

Compare baseline

9 q

Flag regression

1 live

File issue

6 q

Evidence trail

Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind

Auditor pack

This is the readable trail. more

Cleared run load
-251m
Test Generation Agent
Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached
Cleared compare baseline
-167m
Test Generation Agent
Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached
Holding at flag regression
-84m
Director, Quality Engineering
Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

What happens next

The next station and its rule

File issue

run by Test Generation Agent · AI GBS layer

No gate here. The agent clears this station inside its envelope and posts evidence.

Handed to the AI GBS depot

Why the signal is what it is

Derived from time against commitment, not from the state

Amber. Either this item is at or past the time it was committed to and is not material enough to escalate, or it is inside the time but has burned three quarters of it while carrying high or critical materiality. Amber says nothing about who holds it: an item can be amber and moving normally through an agent.

clock 4h 11m against a commitment of 3h 18m · 127% of the time used

materiality medium · blast radius 5 records or people downstream

state evidence-posted — held separately, and deliberately not part of this reading

Past SLA by 53m · 5 people or records downstream of this decision