LensReading which lens this session carries.
EN5C-1003Evidence postedlow materiality

Test run at file issue

Rosa Ito

Engineering · Test & Assurance · EN5C Performance Baseline

$37k

value

73%

confidence

29

people affected

4h 47m

age

3h 41m

sla

100%

progress

Currently held by

C2L spine

Running in the shared AI GBS spine

Raised by

Jonas Mensah

Requester of record

At station

File issue

AI GBS layer · station 4 of 4

Where this train is on the line

EN5CPerformance BaselineTransactional · 4 stations

Run load

28 q

Compare baseline

9 q

Flag regression

6 q

File issue

1 live

Evidence trail

Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind

This is the readable trail. The same actions are held in the append-only evidence spine with their authority grant, version stamps and hash links; open the auditor pack to see them.

  1. Cleared run load

    -287m

    Test Generation Agent

    Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached

  2. Cleared compare baseline

    -215m

    Test Generation Agent

    Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached

  3. Cleared flag regression

    -144m

    Director, Quality Engineering

    Approval recorded with rationale and policy clause cited

  4. Holding at file issue

    -72m

    Test Generation Agent

    Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached

What happens next

The next station and its rule

This is the last station. Once it clears, the unit closes and the outcome is booked.

Why the signal is what it is

Plain reading of the current state

Amber. The agent completed the work but the outcome fell into a sampling band, so it posted evidence for review rather than closing silently. Work carries on; a human confirms after the fact.

Past SLA by 1h 6m · 29 people or records downstream of this decision