Test run at file issue

Rosa Ito

Engineering · Test & Assurance · EN5C Performance Baseline

$37k

value

73%

confidence

people affected

4h 47m

age

3h 41m

sla

100%

progress

Currently held by

C2L spine

Running in the shared AI GBS spine

Raised by

Jonas Mensah

Requester of record

At station

File issue

AI GBS layer · station 4 of 4

Where this train is on the line

EN5CPerformance BaselineTransactional · 4 stations

Run load

28 q

Compare baseline

9 q

Flag regression

6 q

File issue

1 live

Evidence trail

Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind

Auditor pack

This is the readable trail. more

Cleared run load
-287m
Test Generation Agent
Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached
Cleared compare baseline
-215m
Test Generation Agent
Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached
Cleared flag regression
-144m
Director, Quality Engineering
Approval recorded with rationale and policy clause cited
Holding at file issue
-72m
Test Generation Agent
Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached

What happens next

The next station and its rule

This is the last station. more

Why the signal is what it is

Derived from time against commitment, not from the state

Amber. Either this item is at or past the time it was committed to and is not material enough to escalate, or it is inside the time but has burned three quarters of it while carrying high or critical materiality. Amber says nothing about who holds it: an item can be amber and moving normally through an agent.

clock 4h 47m against a commitment of 3h 41m · 130% of the time used

materiality low · blast radius 29 records or people downstream

state evidence-posted — held separately, and deliberately not part of this reading

Past SLA by 1h 6m · 29 people or records downstream of this decision