LensReading which lens this session carries.
EN4C-1058Human holdmedium materiality

Pull request at team review

Oscar Novak

Engineering · Code Review & Quality · EN4C Convention Change

$91k

value

52%

confidence

139

people affected

1h 10m

age

8h 41m

sla

50%

progress

Currently held by

Director, Engineering Quality

A person owns the next move

Raised by

Nadia Voss

Requester of record

At station

Team review

Policy layer · station 2 of 4

Where this train is on the line

EN4CConvention ChangeTransactional · 4 stations

Propose

19 q

Team review

1 live

Ratify

4 q

Enforce

3 q

Evidence trail

Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind

This is the readable trail.

  1. Cleared propose

    -70m

    Static Analysis Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  2. Holding at team review

    -35m

    Director, Engineering Quality

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

What happens next

The next station and its rule

Ratify

run by Director, Engineering Quality · Policy layer

Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the pull request decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.

approver Director, Engineering Quality

Why the signal is what it is

Derived from time against commitment, not from the state

Green. This item is still inside the time it was committed to, and it is not close enough to that line for its materiality to pull it forward. Green says nothing about who holds it: an item can be green and sitting with a person.

clock 1h 10m against a commitment of 8h 41m · 13% of the time used
materiality medium · blast radius 139 records or people downstream
state human-hold — held separately, and deliberately not part of this reading