Pull request at team review
Grace Delgado
Engineering · Code Review & Quality · EN4C Convention Change
$4k
value
77%
confidence
35
people affected
8h 28m
age
8h 41m
sla
50%
progress
Currently held by
Code Quality Orchestrator
An agent owns the next move
Raised by
Leila Bianchi
Requester of record
At station
Team review
Policy layer · station 2 of 4
Where this train is on the line
Evidence trail
Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind
This is the readable trail. The same actions are held in the append-only evidence spine with their authority grant, version stamps and hash links; open the auditor pack to see them.
Cleared propose
-508mStatic Analysis Agent
Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log
Holding at team review
-254mDirector, Engineering Quality
Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log
What happens next
The next station and its rule
Ratify
run by Director, Engineering Quality · Policy layer
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the pull request decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
approver Director, Engineering Quality
Why the signal is what it is
Plain reading of the current state
Amber. The agent completed the work but the outcome fell into a sampling band, so it posted evidence for review rather than closing silently. Work carries on; a human confirms after the fact.