Pull request at propose
Amara Nakamura
Engineering · Code Review & Quality · EN4C Convention Change
$54k
value
89%
confidence
22
people affected
1h 4m
age
1h 3m
sla
25%
progress
Currently held by
Quality Policy Agent
An agent owns the next move
Raised by
Bruno Voss
Requester of record
At station
Propose
Workflow layer · station 1 of 4
Where this train is on the line
Evidence trail
Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind
This is the readable trail. more
Holding at propose
-64mStatic Analysis Agent
Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log
What happens next
The next station and its rule
Team review
run by Director, Engineering Quality · Policy layer
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the pull request decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
approver Director, Engineering Quality
Why the signal is what it is
Derived from time against commitment, not from the state
Amber. Either this item is at or past the time it was committed to and is not material enough to escalate, or it is inside the time but has burned three quarters of it while carrying high or critical materiality. Amber says nothing about who holds it: an item can be amber and moving normally through an agent.
Past SLA by 1m · 22 people or records downstream of this decision