LensReading which lens this session carries.
EN4C-1005In flightmedium materiality

Pull request at propose

Wren Kowalski

Engineering · Code Review & Quality · EN4C Convention Change

$49k

value

89%

confidence

34

people affected

20m

age

1h 3m

sla

25%

progress

Currently held by

Convention Enforcement Agent

An agent owns the next move

Raised by

Hannah Achebe

Requester of record

At station

Propose

Workflow layer · station 1 of 4

Where this train is on the line

EN4CConvention ChangeTransactional · 4 stations

Propose

1 live

Team review

8 q

Ratify

4 q

Enforce

3 q

Evidence trail

Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind

This is the readable trail.

  1. Holding at propose

    -20m

    Static Analysis Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

What happens next

The next station and its rule

Team review

run by Director, Engineering Quality · Policy layer

Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the pull request decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.

approver Director, Engineering Quality

Why the signal is what it is

Derived from time against commitment, not from the state

Green. This item is still inside the time it was committed to, and it is not close enough to that line for its materiality to pull it forward. Green says nothing about who holds it: an item can be green and sitting with a person.

clock 20m against a commitment of 1h 3m · 32% of the time used
materiality medium · blast radius 34 records or people downstream
state in-flight — held separately, and deliberately not part of this reading