Pull request at human review
Wren Novak
Engineering · Code Review & Quality · EN4A Pull Request Review
$27k
value
41%
confidence
66
people affected
3h 56m
age
3h 1m
sla
83%
progress
Currently held by
Director, Engineering Quality
A person owns the next move
Raised by
Anika Sorensen
Requester of record
At station
Human review
Policy layer · station 5 of 6
Where this train is on the line
Evidence trail
Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind
This is the readable trail. more
Cleared static analysis
-236mCode Quality Orchestrator
Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached
Cleared generate review comments
-189mStatic Analysis Agent
Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached
Cleared score risk
-142mComplexity Monitor
Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log
Cleared auto-approve trivial
-94mComplexity Monitor
Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached
Holding at human review
-47mDirector, Engineering Quality
Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log
What happens next
The next station and its rule
Merge
run by Director, Engineering Quality · Policy layer
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the pull request decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
approver Director, Engineering Quality
Why the signal is what it is
Derived from time against commitment, not from the state
Amber. Either this item is at or past the time it was committed to and is not material enough to escalate, or it is inside the time but has burned three quarters of it while carrying high or critical materiality. Amber says nothing about who holds it: an item can be amber and moving normally through an agent.
Past SLA by 55m · 66 people or records downstream of this decision