Request at score value
Lukas Sandoval
Engineering · Portfolio & Intake · EN1A Intake-to-Backlog
$43k
value
76%
confidence
28
people affected
3h 33m
age
3h 4m
sla
71%
progress
Currently held by
Value Scoring Agent
An agent owns the next move
Raised by
Simon Haddad
Requester of record
At station
Score value
Workflow layer · station 5 of 7
Where this train is on the line
Evidence trail
Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind
This is the readable trail. more
Cleared receive request
-213mRequest Triage Agent
Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached
Cleared triage
-170mRequest Triage Agent
Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached
Cleared estimate effort
-128mDependency Mapping Agent
Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log
Cleared map dependencies
-85mCapacity Modeling Agent
Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log
Holding at score value
-43mValue Scoring Agent
Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log
What happens next
The next station and its rule
Prioritization forum
run by VP Engineering Operations · Policy layer
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the request decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
approver VP Engineering Operations
Why the signal is what it is
Derived from time against commitment, not from the state
Amber. Either this item is at or past the time it was committed to and is not material enough to escalate, or it is inside the time but has burned three quarters of it while carrying high or critical materiality. Amber says nothing about who holds it: an item can be amber and moving normally through an agent.
Past SLA by 29m · 28 people or records downstream of this decision