Finding at investigate
Jonas Achebe
Engineering · Security Engineering · EN10B Secret Exposure Response
$52k
value
78%
confidence
35
people affected
1h 20m
age
1h 10m
sla
83%
progress
Currently held by
Dependency Risk Agent
An agent owns the next move
Raised by
Farrah Ito
Requester of record
At station
Investigate
Workflow layer · station 5 of 6
Where this train is on the line
Evidence trail
Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind
This is the readable trail. more
Cleared detect
-80mVulnerability Scanning Agent
Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached
Cleared revoke credential
-64mVulnerability Scanning Agent
Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached
Cleared notify
-48mDirector, Security Engineering
Approval recorded with rationale and policy clause cited
Cleared rotate
-32mVulnerability Scanning Agent
Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached
Holding at investigate
-16mPatch Orchestration Agent
Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log
What happens next
The next station and its rule
Close
run by Director, Security Engineering · Policy layer
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the finding decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
approver Director, Security Engineering
Why the signal is what it is
Derived from time against commitment, not from the state
Amber. Either this item is at or past the time it was committed to and is not material enough to escalate, or it is inside the time but has burned three quarters of it while carrying high or critical materiality. Amber says nothing about who holds it: an item can be amber and moving normally through an agent.
Past SLA by 10m · 35 people or records downstream of this decision