Finding at verify
Pierre Okafor
Engineering · Security Engineering · EN10A Vulnerability Remediation
$74k
value
92%
confidence
29
people affected
3h 18m
age
2h 29m
sla
86%
progress
Currently held by
IT spine
Running in the shared AI GBS spine
Raised by
Talia Kaplan
Requester of record
At station
Verify
AI GBS layer · station 6 of 7
Where this train is on the line
Evidence trail
Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind
This is the readable trail. more
Cleared score severity
-198mVulnerability Scanning Agent
Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached
Cleared auto-patch low risk
-158mVulnerability Scanning Agent
Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached
Cleared assign owner
-119mThreat Modeling Agent
Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log
Cleared escalate critical
-79mDirector, Security Engineering
Approval recorded with rationale and policy clause cited
Holding at verify
-40mVulnerability Scanning Agent
Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached
What happens next
The next station and its rule
Close
run by Security Engineering Orchestrator · Workflow layer
No gate here. The agent clears this station inside its envelope and posts evidence.
Why the signal is what it is
Derived from time against commitment, not from the state
Amber. Either this item is at or past the time it was committed to and is not material enough to escalate, or it is inside the time but has burned three quarters of it while carrying high or critical materiality. Amber says nothing about who holds it: an item can be amber and moving normally through an agent.
Past SLA by 49m · 29 people or records downstream of this decision