Continuity plan at communicate
Maeve Ito
Administration · Business Continuity · AD9C Live Disruption Response
$13k
value
74%
confidence
12
people affected
40m
age
22m
sla
83%
progress
Currently held by
Plan Maintenance Agent
An agent owns the next move
Raised by
Aaron Nakamura
Requester of record
At station
Communicate
Workflow layer · station 5 of 6
Where this train is on the line
Evidence trail
Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind
This is the readable trail. more
Cleared detect
-40mBusiness Impact Analysis Agent
Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log
Cleared assess
-32mDependency Mapping Agent
Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log
Cleared activate
-24mDirector, Business Continuity
Approval recorded with rationale and policy clause cited
Cleared coordinate
-16mExercise Design Agent
Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log
Holding at communicate
-8mCrisis Comms Agent
Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log
What happens next
The next station and its rule
Stand down
run by Director, Business Continuity · Policy layer
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the continuity plan decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
approver Director, Business Continuity
Why the signal is what it is
Derived from time against commitment, not from the state
Amber. Either this item is at or past the time it was committed to and is not material enough to escalate, or it is inside the time but has burned three quarters of it while carrying high or critical materiality. Amber says nothing about who holds it: an item can be amber and moving normally through an agent.
Past SLA by 18m · 12 people or records downstream of this decision