Outcome coverage
Invoice to payment
The platform observes 0.0% of the 352 chain links in scope here, reconstructs 82.1%, and estimates that 63 happen where it cannot read them. This statement was produced by stage link provenance and carries a band of plus or minus 29%.
The method behind this statement
Stage link provenance · owned by Sofia Kalogeropoulou · Service owner
No stage link on this service is joined on a shared key. Every chain here is inferred, which is why the observed figure is zero rather than small.
Observed is the count of stage links joined on a shared key. Inferred is joined by rule or by cohort. Unseen is the residual against the declared instance count.
Paper and PDF invoices received directly by a business unit and forwarded weeks later.
Who has signed for it
Nobody. This figure rests on its method alone.
An attestation would not turn an estimate into a measurement. It would put a person behind the estimate, which is the difference between a number and a claim. This statement does not have one.
What this statement is, and what it is not
Coverage can only ever be estimated from the outside. Observed is a count the platform can produce from records it holds. Inferred is a count it reconstructs by rule or by cohort. Unseen is an estimate of work the platform knows exists and cannot read, and every statement carries the method that produced it and a stated uncertainty. Nothing here is rounded up.
A coverage statement is disputable by design. The way to disagree with one is to inspect the method and the basis for the unseen figure, both of which are on the statement, rather than to argue about the number.