LensReading which lens this session carries.
The catalogueSupply ChainOrder PromisingTransactional

Service SC9B

Promise Breach Response

Runs transactional. Starts when a request lands in the queue. It runs 2,954 times a week across 5 stations. One of those stations stops for a person and 4 are done by an agent, 2 of them on the shared spine.

Runs a week

2,954

72 in flight right now.

Stations

5

1 person · 2 agent · 2 spine

Agent share of steps

80%

Autonomy on this service is set at 87% against a ceiling of 90%.

Decisions a person makes

1

Held by Director, Order Promising.

Touchless

90%

Share of runs that complete without anybody opening them.

Timetable against actual

18.9h

Actual 22.0h, 3.1h over the timetable.

Operations

The lane diagram

Read it left to right.

Person1 station and 27% of the dwellAgent2 stations and 42% of the dwellShared spine2 stations and 30% of the dwell3 crossings between lanes
Human
decides
Agent
does the work
GBS
shared spine
System
attributed by rule
Group ERP — Materials and Inventory
Enterprise Data Warehouse
Group ERP — Materials and Inventory
Group ERP — Materials and Inventory
Group ERP — Materials and Inventory
Click any station to see who does it, what it costs in time, the rule that gates it and the system attributed to it.

Operations

Every station in order

The same stations as a list, with the dwell the estate records against each one and the system a station of that shape would touch.

#StationLaneWhoLayerDwellTargetIn flightSystem
1

Detect slip

GBSAvailable-to-Promise Agentgbs30m1h 9m0Group ERP — Materials and Inventory
2

Assess customer impact

AgentCapable-to-Promise Agentworkflow1h 55m2h 46m35Enterprise Data Warehouse
3

Draft communication

AgentSubstitution Agentworkflow43m1h 10m0Group ERP — Materials and Inventory
4

Owner approve

Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the promise decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.

HumanDirector, Order Promisingpolicy1h 41m3h 46m3Group ERP — Materials and Inventory
5

Notify

Hands over at customer-service

GBSAvailable-to-Promise Agentgbs1h 23m2h 15m34Group ERP — Materials and Inventory

Operations

Run it

Change the volume, move the autonomy line, release a gate, and watch what happens to the hours in each lane and to the time it takes one run to get through.

Move something
Demand100%
2,954 a week is what the estate records.
Decisions handed to agents0 of 0
This service has at most one gate, so there is nothing to hand over without removing the last human decision.
People on the gates143 people
Each one is assumed to have 2,100 productive minutes a week, which is 35 hours.
Agent speed100%
100% is the dwell the estate records today.
Person time a week
4,972.6h
2,954 items at 101 minutes of decision each.
Agent time a week
13,342.2h
271 minutes an item, which does not compete for a person.
Gate load
99%
Inside capacity, with 32.4h of headroom.
Stations without a person
80%
1 gate left on 5 stations.
Where an item spends its time
27% waiting on a person
73% in the agent lane
An item now takes 372 minutes of worked time end to end against 372 in the recorded estate, a change of +0%. This is worked time, not calendar time: nothing here models a queue or a weekend.
What this model is, on Promise Breach Response

The simulation is arithmetic on the estate, not a queueing model.

How it runs

Run it again, going wrong

The same unit and the same stations, broken the way the estate already records breaking.

5 stations, walked twice

Once clean, once with the categories the estate counts

This is the same unit on the same stations, breaking.

No break below was chosen.

One play head, two tracks, the same scale. The clean run stops when it runs out of stations; the other one keeps going.

As written

5 stations, nothing waiting, nothing sent back

0 min of 6.2 hrs

now Detect slip · Available-to-Promise Agent · 30 min

As the ledger has it

the same stations, plus 4 categories the estate already counts

0 min of 20 hrs

now Detect slip · Available-to-Promise Agent · 30 min

personagentshared spinework the break addsnobody working it

What breaks, and where it is counted

No break below was chosen.

What the two runs say together

4 counted categories land on this procedure.

What this run cannot claim

These breaks are shown together on one unit so the shape of a bad day fits on one screen.

The separation register records a duty conflict against a sub-function and a named post, not against one procedure.

Two clocks run. Worked time is the sum of the time the work is actually being done …

Live observability

Systems this service would touch

Attributed by rule from the function's system list.

2 systems attributed

0 of 2 returning records

Group ERP — Materials and Inventory

SAP S/4HANA MM · supply · bidirectional · high

modeled

4 of 5 stations attributed here · would write back

Enterprise Data Warehouse

Snowflake · analytics · inbound · critical

modeled

1 of 5 stations attributed here · read only

System attribution is a rule, not a reading.

Who runs it

Orchestration and accountability

Orchestrated by
Order Promising Orchestrator
That orchestrator’s remit
Owns promise work end to end inside Supply Chain. Runs 3 lines across 15 stations, drains the repeatable share into the M2D tower, and holds 2 human gates.
Accountable person
Director, Order Promising
Sub-function
Order Promising
Shared spine tower
m2d
Hand-over points
customer-service

Other services in this sub-function

2 alongside this one

What this page is and is not

This is a catalogue of the modeled estate.