LensReading which lens this session carries.
The catalogueResearch & DevelopmentData Science & ModelingTransactional

Service RD5A

Model Development

Runs transactional. Starts when a scheduled window opens. It runs 2,326 times a week across 8 stations. 2 of those stations stop for a person and 6 are done by an agent, 4 of them on the shared spine.

Runs a week

2,326

94 in flight right now.

Stations

8

2 person · 2 agent · 4 spine

Agent share of steps

75%

Autonomy on this service is set at 75% against a ceiling of 83%.

Decisions a person makes

2

Held by Director, Data Science.

Touchless

76%

Share of runs that complete without anybody opening them.

Timetable against actual

16.1h

Actual 13.6h, 2.5h under the timetable.

Operations

The lane diagram

Read it left to right.

Person2 stations and 28% of the dwellAgent2 stations and 14% of the dwellShared spine4 stations and 59% of the dwell5 crossings between lanes
Human
decides
Agent
does the work
GBS
shared spine
System
attributed by rule
Product Lifecycle Management
Product Lifecycle Management
Product Lifecycle Management
Product Lifecycle Management
Research Notebook and Experiment Data
Product Lifecycle Management
Product Lifecycle Management
Product Lifecycle Management
Click any station to see who does it, what it costs in time, the rule that gates it and the system attributed to it.

Operations

Every station in order

The same stations as a list, with the dwell the estate records against each one and the system a station of that shape would touch.

#StationLaneWhoLayerDwellTargetIn flightSystem
1

Frame problem

AgentFeature Engineering Agentworkflow44m1h0Product Lifecycle Management
2

Engineer features

GBSFeature Engineering Agentgbs2h 32m4h 31m31Product Lifecycle Management
3

Train

GBSFeature Engineering Agentgbs1h 29m3h 30m13Product Lifecycle Management
4

Validate

GBSFeature Engineering Agentgbs2h 59m3h 57m27Product Lifecycle Management
5

Explainability pack

AgentExplainability Agentworkflow1h 23m2h 27m4Research Notebook and Experiment Data
6

Reviewer approve

Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the model decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.

HumanDirector, Data Sciencepolicy1h 21m2h 24m9Product Lifecycle Management
7

Register

GBSFeature Engineering Agentgbs2h 10m3h 1m2Product Lifecycle Management
8

Deploy

Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the model decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.

HumanDirector, Data Sciencepolicy3h 1m6h 50m8Product Lifecycle Management

Operations

Run it

Change the volume, move the autonomy line, release a gate, and watch what happens to the hours in each lane and to the time it takes one run to get through.

Move something
Demand100%
2,326 a week is what the estate records.
Decisions handed to agents0 of 2
Cheapest decision first. The last gate never moves: something on this service always ends with a person.
People on the gates291 people
Each one is assumed to have 2,100 productive minutes a week, which is 35 hours.
Agent speed100%
100% is the dwell the estate records today.
Person time a week
10,156.9h
2,326 items at 262 minutes of decision each.
Agent time a week
26,245h
677 minutes an item, which does not compete for a person.
Gate load
100%
Inside capacity, with 28.1h of headroom.
Stations without a person
75%
2 gates left on 8 stations.
Where an item spends its time
28% waiting on a person
72% in the agent lane
An item now takes 939 minutes of worked time end to end against 939 in the recorded estate, a change of +0%. This is worked time, not calendar time: nothing here models a queue or a weekend.
What this model is, on Model Development

The simulation is arithmetic on the estate, not a queueing model.

How it runs

Run it again, going wrong

The same unit and the same stations, broken the way the estate already records breaking.

8 stations, walked twice

Once clean, once with the categories the estate counts

This is the same unit on the same stations, breaking.

No break below was chosen.

One play head, two tracks, the same scale. The clean run stops when it runs out of stations; the other one keeps going.

As written

8 stations, nothing waiting, nothing sent back

0 min of 16 hrs

now Frame problem · Feature Engineering Agent · 44 min

As the ledger has it

the same stations, plus 6 categories the estate already counts

0 min of 2.1 days

now Frame problem · Feature Engineering Agent · 44 min

personagentshared spinework the break addsnobody working it

What breaks, and where it is counted

No break below was chosen.

What the two runs say together

6 counted categories land on this procedure.

What this run cannot claim

These breaks are shown together on one unit so the shape of a bad day fits on one screen.

The separation register records a duty conflict against a sub-function and a named post, not against one procedure.

Two clocks run. Worked time is the sum of the time the work is actually being done …

Live observability

Systems this service would touch

Attributed by rule from the function's system list.

2 systems attributed

0 of 2 returning records

Product Lifecycle Management

Siemens Teamcenter · engineering · inbound · high

modeled

7 of 8 stations attributed here · read only

Research Notebook and Experiment Data

Benchling · engineering · inbound · medium

not-connected

1 of 8 stations attributed here · read only

System attribution is a rule, not a reading.

Who runs it

Orchestration and accountability

Orchestrated by
Modeling Orchestrator
That orchestrator’s remit
Owns model work end to end inside Research & Development. Runs 3 lines across 19 stations, drains the repeatable share into the DATA-ANALYTICS tower, and holds 4 human gates.
Accountable person
Director, Data Science
Sub-function
Data Science & Modeling
Shared spine tower
data-analytics
Hand-over points
None — this service stays inside its function

Other services in this sub-function

2 alongside this one

What this page is and is not

This is a catalogue of the modeled estate.