LensReading which lens this session carries.
The catalogueResearch & DevelopmentTechnology ScoutingJudgment

Service RD10B

Build-Buy-Partner Position

Runs judgment. Starts when a break condition on a live position fires. It runs 2 times a week across 5 stations. One of those stations stops for a person and 4 are done by an agent, none of them on the shared spine.

Runs a week

2

105 in flight right now.

Stations

5

1 person · 4 agent · 0 spine

Agent share of steps

80%

Autonomy on this service is set at 76% against a ceiling of 84%.

Decisions a person makes

1

Held by Director, Technology Scouting.

Touchless

39%

Share of runs that complete without anybody opening them.

Timetable against actual

436.0h

Actual 471.7h, 35.7h over the timetable.

Operations

The lane diagram

Read it left to right.

Person1 station and 31% of the dwellAgent4 stations and 69% of the dwellShared spine0 stations and 0% of the dwell1 crossing between lanes
Human
decides
Agent
does the work
GBS
shared spine
System
attributed by rule
Product Lifecycle Management
Product Lifecycle Management
Product Lifecycle Management
Product Lifecycle Management
Product Lifecycle Management
Click any station to see who does it, what it costs in time, the rule that gates it and the system attributed to it.

Operations

Every station in order

The same stations as a list, with the dwell the estate records against each one and the system a station of that shape would touch.

#StationLaneWhoLayerDwellTargetIn flightSystem
1

Frame

AgentLandscape Monitoring Agentstrategy39h 4m75h 52m33Product Lifecycle Management
2

Model options

AgentStartup Screening Agentstrategy67h 6m155h 2m19Product Lifecycle Management
3

Draft position

AgentCapability Match Agentstrategy13h 22m16h 32m33Product Lifecycle Management
4

Challenge

AgentBuild-Buy-Partner Agentstrategy61h 27m117h 2m13Product Lifecycle Management
5

Ratify

Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the candidate decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.

HumanDirector, Technology Scoutingpolicy79h 28m131h 25m7Product Lifecycle Management

Operations

Run it

Change the volume, move the autonomy line, release a gate, and watch what happens to the hours in each lane and to the time it takes one run to get through.

Move something
Demand100%
2 a week is what the estate records.
Decisions handed to agents0 of 0
This service has at most one gate, so there is nothing to hand over without removing the last human decision.
People on the gates5 people
Each one is assumed to have 2,100 productive minutes a week, which is 35 hours.
Agent speed100%
100% is the dwell the estate records today.
Person time a week
158.9h
2 items at 4,768 minutes of decision each.
Agent time a week
362h
10,859 minutes an item, which does not compete for a person.
Gate load
91%
Inside capacity, with 16.1h of headroom.
Stations without a person
80%
1 gate left on 5 stations.
Where an item spends its time
31% waiting on a person
69% in the agent lane
An item now takes 15,627 minutes of worked time end to end against 15,627 in the recorded estate, a change of +0%. This is worked time, not calendar time: nothing here models a queue or a weekend.
What this model is, on Build-Buy-Partner Position

The simulation is arithmetic on the estate, not a queueing model.

How it runs

Run it again, going wrong

The same unit and the same stations, broken the way the estate already records breaking.

5 stations, walked twice

Once clean, once with the categories the estate counts

This is the same unit on the same stations, breaking.

No break below was chosen.

One play head, two tracks, the same scale. The clean run stops when it runs out of stations; the other one keeps going.

As written

5 stations, nothing waiting, nothing sent back

0 min of 10.9 days

now Frame · Landscape Monitoring Agent · 39 hrs

As the ledger has it

the same stations, plus 3 categories the estate already counts

0 min of 11.1 days

now Frame · Landscape Monitoring Agent · 39 hrs

personagentshared spinework the break addsnobody working it

What breaks, and where it is counted

No break below was chosen.

What the two runs say together

3 counted categories land on this procedure.

What this run cannot claim

These breaks are shown together on one unit so the shape of a bad day fits on one screen.

Two clocks run. Worked time is the sum of the time the work is actually being done …

Live observability

Systems this service would touch

Attributed by rule from the function's system list.

1 systems attributed

0 of 1 returning records

Product Lifecycle Management

Siemens Teamcenter · engineering · inbound · high

modeled

5 of 5 stations attributed here · read only

System attribution is a rule, not a reading.

Who runs it

Orchestration and accountability

Orchestrated by
Technology Scouting Orchestrator
That orchestrator’s remit
Owns candidate work end to end inside Research & Development. Runs 3 lines across 16 stations, drains the repeatable share into no shared tower, and holds 3 human gates.
Accountable person
Director, Technology Scouting
Sub-function
Technology Scouting
Shared spine tower
Not on the shared spine
Hand-over points
None — this service stays inside its function

Other services in this sub-function

2 alongside this one

What this page is and is not

This is a catalogue of the modeled estate.