LensReading which lens this session carries.
The catalogueEngineeringDeveloper ExperienceTransactional

Service EN9C

Developer Onboarding

Runs transactional. Starts when a scheduled window opens. It runs 4,391 times a week across 5 stations. One of those stations stops for a person and 4 are done by an agent, 2 of them on the shared spine.

Runs a week

4,391

124 in flight right now.

Stations

5

1 person · 2 agent · 2 spine

Agent share of steps

80%

Autonomy on this service is set at 85% against a ceiling of 90%.

Decisions a person makes

1

Held by Director, Developer Platform.

Touchless

90%

Share of runs that complete without anybody opening them.

Timetable against actual

9.5h

Actual 9.2h, 0.3h under the timetable.

Operations

The lane diagram

Read it left to right.

Person1 station and 60% of the dwellAgent2 stations and 31% of the dwellShared spine2 stations and 9% of the dwell3 crossings between lanes
Human
decides
Agent
does the work
GBS
shared spine
System
attributed by rule
Configuration Management Database
Group ERP — Materials and Inventory
Group ERP — Materials and Inventory
Group ERP — Materials and Inventory
Group ERP — Materials and Inventory
Click any station to see who does it, what it costs in time, the rule that gates it and the system attributed to it.

Operations

Every station in order

The same stations as a list, with the dwell the estate records against each one and the system a station of that shape would touch.

#StationLaneWhoLayerDwellTargetIn flightSystem
1

Trigger

Hands over at human-resources

AgentBuild Time Agentworkflow2h 47m5h 37m42Configuration Management Database
2

Provision toolchain

GBSBuild Time Agentgbs8m15m24Group ERP — Materials and Inventory
3

Assign path

GBSBuild Time Agentgbs1h 1m2h 16m30Group ERP — Materials and Inventory
4

Verify readiness

AgentOnboarding Automation Agentworkflow1h 7m1h 19m26Group ERP — Materials and Inventory
5

Manager confirm

Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the developer request decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.

HumanDirector, Developer Platformpolicy7h 31m16h 21m2Group ERP — Materials and Inventory

Operations

Run it

Change the volume, move the autonomy line, release a gate, and watch what happens to the hours in each lane and to the time it takes one run to get through.

Move something
Demand100%
4,391 a week is what the estate records.
Decisions handed to agents0 of 0
This service has at most one gate, so there is nothing to hand over without removing the last human decision.
People on the gates944 people
Each one is assumed to have 2,100 productive minutes a week, which is 35 hours.
Agent speed100%
100% is the dwell the estate records today.
Person time a week
33,005.7h
4,391 items at 451 minutes of decision each.
Agent time a week
22,174.6h
303 minutes an item, which does not compete for a person.
Gate load
100%
Inside capacity, with 34.3h of headroom.
Stations without a person
80%
1 gate left on 5 stations.
Where an item spends its time
60% waiting on a person
40% in the agent lane
An item now takes 754 minutes of worked time end to end against 754 in the recorded estate, a change of +0%. This is worked time, not calendar time: nothing here models a queue or a weekend.
What this model is, on Developer Onboarding

The simulation is arithmetic on the estate, not a queueing model.

How it runs

Run it again, going wrong

The same unit and the same stations, broken the way the estate already records breaking.

5 stations, walked twice

Once clean, once with the categories the estate counts

This is the same unit on the same stations, breaking.

No break below was chosen.

One play head, two tracks, the same scale. The clean run stops when it runs out of stations; the other one keeps going.

As written

5 stations, nothing waiting, nothing sent back

0 min of 13 hrs

now Trigger · Build Time Agent · 2.8 hrs

As the ledger has it

the same stations, plus 4 categories the estate already counts

0 min of 26 hrs

now Trigger · Build Time Agent · 2.8 hrs

personagentshared spinework the break addsnobody working it

What breaks, and where it is counted

No break below was chosen.

What the two runs say together

4 counted categories land on this procedure.

What this run cannot claim

These breaks are shown together on one unit so the shape of a bad day fits on one screen.

The separation register records a duty conflict against a sub-function and a named post, not against one procedure.

Two clocks run. Worked time is the sum of the time the work is actually being done …

Live observability

Systems this service would touch

Attributed by rule from the function's system list.

2 systems attributed

0 of 2 returning records

Group ERP — Materials and Inventory

SAP S/4HANA MM · supply · bidirectional · high

modeled

4 of 5 stations attributed here · would write back

Configuration Management Database

ServiceNow CMDB · itsm · inbound · high

modeled

1 of 5 stations attributed here · read only

System attribution is a rule, not a reading.

Who runs it

Orchestration and accountability

Orchestrated by
Developer Experience Orchestrator
That orchestrator’s remit
Owns developer request work end to end inside Engineering. Runs 3 lines across 16 stations, drains the repeatable share into the AI-OPS tower, and holds 2 human gates.
Accountable person
Director, Developer Platform
Sub-function
Developer Experience
Shared spine tower
ai-ops
Hand-over points
human-resources

Other services in this sub-function

2 alongside this one

What this page is and is not

This is a catalogue of the modeled estate.