Prove · baseline BL-096
Partner & Channel
Partner & Channel, all regions, as run before the agents were switched on. more
How it was measured
System extract
Sign-off
Who accepted this as the number to beat
Where the benefit lands
Account and cost center this baseline reconciles to
Benefit lines resting on this baseline
10 lines · $4.26m claimed · $3.40m realized · $2.00m verified
| Period | Category | Claimed | Realized | Verified | Status | Variance | Journal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY25 Q3 | Outsourced cost | $548.5k | $449.8k | not verified | Not verified | Scope Scope drifted after the baseline was signed. more | not posted |
| FY25 Q4 | Outsourced cost | $796.7k | $677.2k | $623.0k | Partly verified | Timing Benefit landed one period later than claimed. more | JV-2025Q4-0188 |
| FY26 Q1 | Outsourced cost | $1.02m | $764.1k | $695.3k | Partly verified | Rate The blended labor rate used in the claim sits above the rate actually charged to the cost center. | JV-2026Q1-0189 |
| FY26 Q2 | Outsourced cost | $1.21m | $813.8k | $683.6k | Partly verified | Volume Seasonal volume ran ahead of baseline, which flatters the realized figure rather than the claim. | JV-2026Q2-0190 |
| FY26 Q3 | Outsourced cost | $679.2k | $692.7k | not verified | Period open | Period open The period is not closed. more | not posted |
| FY25 Q3 | Quality | $120.7k | $89.3k | not verified | Non cash | Non cash This is a cycle time or quality improvement. more | not posted |
| FY25 Q4 | Quality | $175.3k | $147.2k | not verified | Non cash | Non cash This is a cycle time or quality improvement. more | not posted |
| FY26 Q1 | Quality | $224.1k | $139.0k | not verified | Non cash | Non cash This is a cycle time or quality improvement. more | not posted |
| FY26 Q2 | Quality | $267.2k | $208.4k | not verified | Non cash | Non cash This is a cycle time or quality improvement. more | not posted |
| FY26 Q3 | Quality | $149.4k | $140.4k | not verified | Non cash | Non cash This is a cycle time or quality improvement. more | not posted |
A benefit realization ledger reconciled to a general ledger needs the customer’s actual baseline figures and account structure. more
The measurement window ran FY24 Q4, thirteen weeks over a sample of 178,425. That sample size is on the page because a baseline drawn from twelve cases and one drawn from forty thousand are not the same instrument, and averaging them into a single confidence figure would hide which one you are looking at.
3 of 5 cash lines resting on this baseline carry a journal reference. A benefit line with no journal reference has not touched the general ledger, so it is shown as claimed rather than counted as realized cash.