Prove · baseline BL-095
Market & Competitive Intelligence
Market & Competitive Intelligence, all regions, as run before the agents were switched on. more
How it was measured
System extract
Sign-off
Who accepted this as the number to beat
Where the benefit lands
Account and cost center this baseline reconciles to
Benefit lines resting on this baseline
10 lines · $4.40m claimed · $3.48m realized · $1.96m verified
| Period | Category | Claimed | Realized | Verified | Status | Variance | Journal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY25 Q3 | Labor cost | $566.7k | $578.0k | not verified | Not verified | Timing Benefit landed one period later than claimed. more | not posted |
| FY25 Q4 | Labor cost | $823.1k | $642.0k | $629.2k | Verified | Volume Seasonal volume ran ahead of baseline, which flatters the realized figure rather than the claim. | JV-2025Q4-0185 |
| FY26 Q1 | Labor cost | $1.05m | $757.8k | $659.3k | Partly verified | Scope Scope drifted after the baseline was signed. more | JV-2026Q1-0186 |
| FY26 Q2 | Labor cost | $1.25m | $803.1k | $666.6k | Partly verified | Rate The blended labor rate used in the claim sits above the rate actually charged to the cost center. | JV-2026Q2-0187 |
| FY26 Q3 | Labor cost | $701.6k | $694.6k | not verified | Period open | Period open The period is not closed. more | not posted |
| FY25 Q3 | Quality | $124.7k | $97.2k | not verified | Non cash | Non cash This is a cycle time or quality improvement. more | not posted |
| FY25 Q4 | Quality | $181.1k | $164.8k | not verified | Non cash | Non cash This is a cycle time or quality improvement. more | not posted |
| FY26 Q1 | Quality | $231.5k | $210.7k | not verified | Non cash | Non cash This is a cycle time or quality improvement. more | not posted |
| FY26 Q2 | Quality | $276.1k | $198.8k | not verified | Non cash | Non cash This is a cycle time or quality improvement. more | not posted |
| FY26 Q3 | Quality | $154.4k | $135.8k | not verified | Non cash | Non cash This is a cycle time or quality improvement. more | not posted |
A benefit realization ledger reconciled to a general ledger needs the customer’s actual baseline figures and account structure. more
The measurement window ran FY24 Q4, thirteen weeks over a sample of 68,458. That sample size is on the page because a baseline drawn from twelve cases and one drawn from forty thousand are not the same instrument, and averaging them into a single confidence figure would hide which one you are looking at.
3 of 5 cash lines resting on this baseline carry a journal reference. A benefit line with no journal reference has not touched the general ledger, so it is shown as claimed rather than counted as realized cash.