Prove · baseline BL-094
Master Data Management
Master Data Management, all regions, as run before the agents were switched on. more
How it was measured
Invoice reconstruction
Sign-off
Who accepted this as the number to beat
Where the benefit lands
Account and cost center this baseline reconciles to
Benefit lines resting on this baseline
5 lines · $4.73m claimed · $4.20m realized · $2.34m verified
| Period | Category | Claimed | Realized | Verified | Status | Variance | Journal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY25 Q3 | Outsourced cost | $610.0k | $591.7k | not verified | Not verified | Scope Scope drifted after the baseline was signed. more | not posted |
| FY25 Q4 | Outsourced cost | $885.9k | $788.5k | $654.4k | Partly verified | Rate The blended labor rate used in the claim sits above the rate actually charged to the cost center. | JV-2025Q4-0182 |
| FY26 Q1 | Outsourced cost | $1.13m | $827.0k | $669.8k | Partly verified | Rate The blended labor rate used in the claim sits above the rate actually charged to the cost center. | JV-2026Q1-0183 |
| FY26 Q2 | Outsourced cost | $1.35m | $1.24m | $1.02m | Partly verified | Unexplained Internal audit could not trace part of the realized figure to a driver. more | JV-2026Q2-0184 |
| FY26 Q3 | Outsourced cost | $755.2k | $755.2k | not verified | Period open | Period open The period is not closed. more | not posted |
A benefit realization ledger reconciled to a general ledger needs the customer’s actual baseline figures and account structure. more
The measurement window ran FY24 Q4, thirteen weeks over a sample of 11,191. That sample size is on the page because a baseline drawn from twelve cases and one drawn from forty thousand are not the same instrument, and averaging them into a single confidence figure would hide which one you are looking at.
3 of 5 cash lines resting on this baseline carry a journal reference. A benefit line with no journal reference has not touched the general ledger, so it is shown as claimed rather than counted as realized cash.