Prove · baseline BL-092
Corporate Services
Corporate Services, all regions, as run before the agents were switched on. more
How it was measured
System extract
Sign-off
Who accepted this as the number to beat
Where the benefit lands
Account and cost center this baseline reconciles to
Benefit lines resting on this baseline
10 lines · $5.73m claimed · $4.74m realized · $0 verified
| Period | Category | Claimed | Realized | Verified | Status | Variance | Journal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY25 Q3 | Outsourced cost | $737.7k | $612.3k | not verified | Not verified | Volume Seasonal volume ran ahead of baseline, which flatters the realized figure rather than the claim. | not posted |
| FY25 Q4 | Outsourced cost | $1.07m | $685.7k | not verified | Not verified | Timing Benefit landed one period later than claimed. more | not posted |
| FY26 Q1 | Outsourced cost | $1.37m | $1.30m | not verified | Not verified | Method mismatch The baseline was measured by survey and the realized figure by system extract. more | not posted |
| FY26 Q2 | Outsourced cost | $1.63m | $1.42m | not verified | Not verified | Unexplained Internal audit could not trace part of the realized figure to a driver. more | not posted |
| FY26 Q3 | Outsourced cost | $913.3k | $721.5k | not verified | Period open | Period open The period is not closed. more | not posted |
| FY25 Q3 | Quality | $162.3k | $146.1k | not verified | Non cash | Non cash This is a cycle time or quality improvement. more | not posted |
| FY25 Q4 | Quality | $235.7k | $181.5k | not verified | Non cash | Non cash This is a cycle time or quality improvement. more | not posted |
| FY26 Q1 | Quality | $301.4k | $280.3k | not verified | Non cash | Non cash This is a cycle time or quality improvement. more | not posted |
| FY26 Q2 | Quality | $359.3k | $265.9k | not verified | Non cash | Non cash This is a cycle time or quality improvement. more | not posted |
| FY26 Q3 | Quality | $200.9k | $180.8k | not verified | Non cash | Non cash This is a cycle time or quality improvement. more | not posted |
A benefit realization ledger reconciled to a general ledger needs the customer’s actual baseline figures and account structure. more
The measurement window ran FY25 Q2, eight weeks, shortened over a sample of 92,781. That sample size is on the page because a baseline drawn from twelve cases and one drawn from forty thousand are not the same instrument, and averaging them into a single confidence figure would hide which one you are looking at.
0 of 5 cash lines resting on this baseline carry a journal reference. A benefit line with no journal reference has not touched the general ledger, so it is shown as claimed rather than counted as realized cash.