LensReading which lens this session carries.

Prove · baseline BL-092

Corporate Services

Corporate Services, all regions, as run before the agents were switched on.

Baseline register

How it was measured

System extract

Method
System extract
Method note
Transaction counts and stage timestamps pulled from the system of record across the whole measurement window.
Window
FY25 Q2, eight weeks, shortened
Sample
92,781
Confidence in the method
0.87

Sign-off

Who accepted this as the number to beat

Status
Unsigned
Signed by
nobody has signed this
Role
—
Signed
never
Caveat carried with the number
No signatory has accepted this measurement.

Where the benefit lands

Account and cost center this baseline reconciles to

General ledger account
6500 · Outsourced services, shared centers
Managed-service fees for the shared towers.
Corporate GL · Third party · owner Sofia Lindqvist, Finance Business Partner, Operations
Cost center
CC-5010 · Administration
Global · owner Marta Alvarez · annual budget $33.17m
Administrationfunction view

Benefit lines resting on this baseline

10 lines · $5.73m claimed · $4.74m realized · $0 verified

PeriodCategoryClaimedRealizedVerifiedStatusVarianceJournal
FY25 Q3Outsourced cost$737.7k$612.3knot verifiedNot verified
Volume
Seasonal volume ran ahead of baseline, which flatters the realized figure rather than the claim.
not posted
FY25 Q4Outsourced cost$1.07m$685.7knot verifiedNot verified
Timing
Benefit landed one period later than claimed.
not posted
FY26 Q1Outsourced cost$1.37m$1.30mnot verifiedNot verified
Method mismatch
The baseline was measured by survey and the realized figure by system extract.
not posted
FY26 Q2Outsourced cost$1.63m$1.42mnot verifiedNot verified
Unexplained
Internal audit could not trace part of the realized figure to a driver.
not posted
FY26 Q3Outsourced cost$913.3k$721.5knot verifiedPeriod open
Period open
The period is not closed.
not posted
FY25 Q3Quality$162.3k$146.1knot verifiedNon cash
Non cash
This is a cycle time or quality improvement.
not posted
FY25 Q4Quality$235.7k$181.5knot verifiedNon cash
Non cash
This is a cycle time or quality improvement.
not posted
FY26 Q1Quality$301.4k$280.3knot verifiedNon cash
Non cash
This is a cycle time or quality improvement.
not posted
FY26 Q2Quality$359.3k$265.9knot verifiedNon cash
Non cash
This is a cycle time or quality improvement.
not posted
FY26 Q3Quality$200.9k$180.8knot verifiedNon cash
Non cash
This is a cycle time or quality improvement.
not posted
What this record is, and what it is not

A benefit realization ledger reconciled to a general ledger needs the customer’s actual baseline figures and account structure.

The measurement window ran FY25 Q2, eight weeks, shortened over a sample of 92,781. That sample size is on the page because a baseline drawn from twelve cases and one drawn from forty thousand are not the same instrument, and averaging them into a single confidence figure would hide which one you are looking at.

0 of 5 cash lines resting on this baseline carry a journal reference. A benefit line with no journal reference has not touched the general ledger, so it is shown as claimed rather than counted as realized cash.