Prove · baseline BL-089
Test & Assurance
Test & Assurance, all regions, as run before the agents were switched on. more
How it was measured
Time and motion
Sign-off
Who accepted this as the number to beat
Where the benefit lands
Account and cost center this baseline reconciles to
Benefit lines resting on this baseline
5 lines · $6.03m claimed · $5.46m realized · $4.41m verified
| Period | Category | Claimed | Realized | Verified | Status | Variance | Journal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY25 Q3 | Outsourced cost | $776.6k | $481.5k | $476.7k | Verified | Scope Scope drifted after the baseline was signed. more | JV-2025Q3-0173 |
| FY25 Q4 | Outsourced cost | $1.13m | $1.15m | $1.02m | Partly verified | Rate The blended labor rate used in the claim sits above the rate actually charged to the cost center. | JV-2025Q4-0174 |
| FY26 Q1 | Outsourced cost | $1.44m | $1.44m | $1.44m | Verified | Within tolerance Claimed, realized and verified agree inside the tolerance the controller set for this account. | JV-2026Q1-0175 |
| FY26 Q2 | Outsourced cost | $1.72m | $1.58m | $1.47m | Partly verified | Unexplained Internal audit could not trace part of the realized figure to a driver. more | JV-2026Q2-0176 |
| FY26 Q3 | Outsourced cost | $961.5k | $807.7k | not verified | Period open | Period open The period is not closed. more | not posted |
A benefit realization ledger reconciled to a general ledger needs the customer’s actual baseline figures and account structure. more
The measurement window ran FY24 Q3, thirteen weeks over a sample of 20,800. That sample size is on the page because a baseline drawn from twelve cases and one drawn from forty thousand are not the same instrument, and averaging them into a single confidence figure would hide which one you are looking at.
4 of 5 cash lines resting on this baseline carry a journal reference. A benefit line with no journal reference has not touched the general ledger, so it is shown as claimed rather than counted as realized cash.