Prove · baseline BL-078
Commercial Advisory
Commercial Advisory, all regions, as run before the agents were switched on. more
How it was measured
System extract
Sign-off
Who accepted this as the number to beat
Where the benefit lands
Account and cost center this baseline reconciles to
Benefit lines resting on this baseline
10 lines · $7.08m claimed · $5.87m realized · $2.50m verified
| Period | Category | Claimed | Realized | Verified | Status | Variance | Journal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY25 Q3 | Avoided cost | $912.7k | $693.6k | $624.3k | Partly verified | Scope Scope drifted after the baseline was signed. more | JV-2025Q3-0151 |
| FY25 Q4 | Avoided cost | $1.33m | $967.7k | $861.2k | Partly verified | Rate The blended labor rate used in the claim sits above the rate actually charged to the cost center. | JV-2025Q4-0152 |
| FY26 Q1 | Avoided cost | $1.69m | $1.12m | $1.02m | Partly verified | Method mismatch The baseline was measured by survey and the realized figure by system extract. more | JV-2026Q1-0153 |
| FY26 Q2 | Avoided cost | $2.02m | $2.04m | not verified | Not verified | Unexplained Internal audit could not trace part of the realized figure to a driver. more | not posted |
| FY26 Q3 | Avoided cost | $1.13m | $1.05m | not verified | Period open | Period open The period is not closed. more | not posted |
| FY25 Q3 | Cycle time | $200.8k | $140.6k | not verified | Non cash | Non cash This is a cycle time or quality improvement. more | not posted |
| FY25 Q4 | Cycle time | $291.6k | $175.0k | not verified | Non cash | Non cash This is a cycle time or quality improvement. more | not posted |
| FY26 Q1 | Cycle time | $372.9k | $320.7k | not verified | Non cash | Non cash This is a cycle time or quality improvement. more | not posted |
| FY26 Q2 | Cycle time | $444.6k | $297.9k | not verified | Non cash | Non cash This is a cycle time or quality improvement. more | not posted |
| FY26 Q3 | Cycle time | $248.6k | $206.3k | not verified | Non cash | Non cash This is a cycle time or quality improvement. more | not posted |
A benefit realization ledger reconciled to a general ledger needs the customer’s actual baseline figures and account structure. more
The measurement window ran FY24 Q3, thirteen weeks over a sample of 184,782. That sample size is on the page because a baseline drawn from twelve cases and one drawn from forty thousand are not the same instrument, and averaging them into a single confidence figure would hide which one you are looking at.
3 of 5 cash lines resting on this baseline carry a journal reference. A benefit line with no journal reference has not touched the general ledger, so it is shown as claimed rather than counted as realized cash.