Prove · baseline BL-074
Demand Planning
Demand Planning, all regions, as run before the agents were switched on. more
How it was measured
System extract
Sign-off
Who accepted this as the number to beat
Where the benefit lands
Account and cost center this baseline reconciles to
Benefit lines resting on this baseline
10 lines · $7.42m claimed · $6.50m realized · $3.99m verified
| Period | Category | Claimed | Realized | Verified | Status | Variance | Journal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY25 Q3 | Outsourced cost | $955.9k | $936.8k | not verified | Not verified | Scope Scope drifted after the baseline was signed. more | not posted |
| FY25 Q4 | Outsourced cost | $1.39m | $1.10m | $921.3k | Partly verified | Method mismatch The baseline was measured by survey and the realized figure by system extract. more | JV-2025Q4-0143 |
| FY26 Q1 | Outsourced cost | $1.78m | $1.69m | $1.47m | Partly verified | Method mismatch The baseline was measured by survey and the realized figure by system extract. more | JV-2026Q1-0144 |
| FY26 Q2 | Outsourced cost | $2.12m | $1.84m | $1.60m | Partly verified | Unexplained Internal audit could not trace part of the realized figure to a driver. more | JV-2026Q2-0145 |
| FY26 Q3 | Outsourced cost | $1.18m | $935.0k | not verified | Period open | Period open The period is not closed. more | not posted |
| FY25 Q3 | Quality | $210.3k | $130.4k | not verified | Non cash | Non cash This is a cycle time or quality improvement. more | not posted |
| FY25 Q4 | Quality | $305.4k | $256.6k | not verified | Non cash | Non cash This is a cycle time or quality improvement. more | not posted |
| FY26 Q1 | Quality | $390.6k | $250.0k | not verified | Non cash | Non cash This is a cycle time or quality improvement. more | not posted |
| FY26 Q2 | Quality | $465.7k | $372.5k | not verified | Non cash | Non cash This is a cycle time or quality improvement. more | not posted |
| FY26 Q3 | Quality | $260.4k | $158.8k | not verified | Non cash | Non cash This is a cycle time or quality improvement. more | not posted |
A benefit realization ledger reconciled to a general ledger needs the customer’s actual baseline figures and account structure. more
The measurement window ran FY24 Q4, thirteen weeks over a sample of 105,859. That sample size is on the page because a baseline drawn from twelve cases and one drawn from forty thousand are not the same instrument, and averaging them into a single confidence figure would hide which one you are looking at.
3 of 5 cash lines resting on this baseline carry a journal reference. A benefit line with no journal reference has not touched the general ledger, so it is shown as claimed rather than counted as realized cash.