Prove · baseline BL-073
Exit Management
Exit Management, all regions, as run before the agents were switched on. more
How it was measured
System extract
Sign-off
Who accepted this as the number to beat
Where the benefit lands
Account and cost center this baseline reconciles to
Benefit lines resting on this baseline
10 lines · $7.43m claimed · $5.93m realized · $3.16m verified
| Period | Category | Claimed | Realized | Verified | Status | Variance | Journal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY25 Q3 | Outsourced cost | $956.7k | $660.1k | $534.7k | Partly verified | Rate The blended labor rate used in the claim sits above the rate actually charged to the cost center. | JV-2025Q3-0140 |
| FY25 Q4 | Outsourced cost | $1.39m | $1.10m | not verified | Not verified | Scope Scope drifted after the baseline was signed. more | not posted |
| FY26 Q1 | Outsourced cost | $1.78m | $1.33m | $1.09m | Partly verified | Scope Scope drifted after the baseline was signed. more | JV-2026Q1-0141 |
| FY26 Q2 | Outsourced cost | $2.12m | $1.76m | $1.53m | Partly verified | Timing Benefit landed one period later than claimed. more | JV-2026Q2-0142 |
| FY26 Q3 | Outsourced cost | $1.18m | $1.08m | not verified | Period open | Period open The period is not closed. more | not posted |
| FY25 Q3 | Cycle time | $210.5k | $147.3k | not verified | Non cash | Non cash This is a cycle time or quality improvement. more | not posted |
| FY25 Q4 | Cycle time | $305.7k | $220.1k | not verified | Non cash | Non cash This is a cycle time or quality improvement. more | not posted |
| FY26 Q1 | Cycle time | $390.9k | $351.8k | not verified | Non cash | Non cash This is a cycle time or quality improvement. more | not posted |
| FY26 Q2 | Cycle time | $466.0k | $344.9k | not verified | Non cash | Non cash This is a cycle time or quality improvement. more | not posted |
| FY26 Q3 | Cycle time | $260.6k | $242.3k | not verified | Non cash | Non cash This is a cycle time or quality improvement. more | not posted |
A benefit realization ledger reconciled to a general ledger needs the customer’s actual baseline figures and account structure. more
The measurement window ran FY25 Q1, thirteen weeks over a sample of 90,246. That sample size is on the page because a baseline drawn from twelve cases and one drawn from forty thousand are not the same instrument, and averaging them into a single confidence figure would hide which one you are looking at.
3 of 5 cash lines resting on this baseline carry a journal reference. A benefit line with no journal reference has not touched the general ledger, so it is shown as claimed rather than counted as realized cash.