Prove · baseline BL-063
Quality & Coaching
Quality & Coaching, all regions, as run before the agents were switched on. more
How it was measured
Invoice reconstruction
Sign-off
Who accepted this as the number to beat
Where the benefit lands
Account and cost center this baseline reconciles to
Benefit lines resting on this baseline
10 lines · $8.51m claimed · $7.57m realized · $0 verified
| Period | Category | Claimed | Realized | Verified | Status | Variance | Journal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY25 Q3 | Labor cost | $1.10m | $953.4k | not verified | Disputed | Scope Scope drifted after the baseline was signed. more | not posted |
| FY25 Q4 | Labor cost | $1.59m | $1.43m | not verified | Disputed | Timing Benefit landed one period later than claimed. more | not posted |
| FY26 Q1 | Labor cost | $2.04m | $1.87m | not verified | Disputed | Method mismatch The baseline was measured by survey and the realized figure by system extract. more | not posted |
| FY26 Q2 | Labor cost | $2.43m | $2.43m | not verified | Disputed | Volume Seasonal volume ran ahead of baseline, which flatters the realized figure rather than the claim. | not posted |
| FY26 Q3 | Labor cost | $1.36m | $881.9k | not verified | Period open | Period open The period is not closed. more | not posted |
| FY25 Q3 | Quality | $241.1k | $173.6k | not verified | Non cash | Non cash This is a cycle time or quality improvement. more | not posted |
| FY25 Q4 | Quality | $350.2k | $287.1k | not verified | Non cash | Non cash This is a cycle time or quality improvement. more | not posted |
| FY26 Q1 | Quality | $447.7k | $371.6k | not verified | Non cash | Non cash This is a cycle time or quality improvement. more | not posted |
| FY26 Q2 | Quality | $533.8k | $357.7k | not verified | Non cash | Non cash This is a cycle time or quality improvement. more | not posted |
| FY26 Q3 | Quality | $298.5k | $256.7k | not verified | Non cash | Non cash This is a cycle time or quality improvement. more | not posted |
A benefit realization ledger reconciled to a general ledger needs the customer’s actual baseline figures and account structure. more
The measurement window ran FY24 Q4, thirteen weeks over a sample of 15,104. That sample size is on the page because a baseline drawn from twelve cases and one drawn from forty thousand are not the same instrument, and averaging them into a single confidence figure would hide which one you are looking at.
0 of 5 cash lines resting on this baseline carry a journal reference. A benefit line with no journal reference has not touched the general ledger, so it is shown as claimed rather than counted as realized cash.