Prove · baseline BL-057
Performance Management
Performance Management, all regions, as run before the agents were switched on. more
How it was measured
System extract
Sign-off
Who accepted this as the number to beat
Where the benefit lands
Account and cost center this baseline reconciles to
Benefit lines resting on this baseline
10 lines · $9.02m claimed · $7.55m realized · $5.75m verified
| Period | Category | Claimed | Realized | Verified | Status | Variance | Journal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY25 Q3 | Outsourced cost | $1.16m | $988.2k | $859.8k | Partly verified | Timing Benefit landed one period later than claimed. more | JV-2025Q3-0114 |
| FY25 Q4 | Outsourced cost | $1.69m | $1.30m | $1.07m | Partly verified | Scope Scope drifted after the baseline was signed. more | JV-2025Q4-0115 |
| FY26 Q1 | Outsourced cost | $2.16m | $1.75m | $1.45m | Partly verified | Scope Scope drifted after the baseline was signed. more | JV-2026Q1-0116 |
| FY26 Q2 | Outsourced cost | $2.57m | $2.57m | $2.37m | Partly verified | Method mismatch The baseline was measured by survey and the realized figure by system extract. more | JV-2026Q2-0117 |
| FY26 Q3 | Outsourced cost | $1.44m | $935.6k | not verified | Period open | Period open The period is not closed. more | not posted |
| FY25 Q3 | Cycle time | $255.8k | $240.4k | not verified | Non cash | Non cash This is a cycle time or quality improvement. more | not posted |
| FY25 Q4 | Cycle time | $371.5k | $278.6k | not verified | Non cash | Non cash This is a cycle time or quality improvement. more | not posted |
| FY26 Q1 | Cycle time | $475.0k | $361.0k | not verified | Non cash | Non cash This is a cycle time or quality improvement. more | not posted |
| FY26 Q2 | Cycle time | $566.4k | $504.1k | not verified | Non cash | Non cash This is a cycle time or quality improvement. more | not posted |
| FY26 Q3 | Cycle time | $316.7k | $231.2k | not verified | Non cash | Non cash This is a cycle time or quality improvement. more | not posted |
A benefit realization ledger reconciled to a general ledger needs the customer’s actual baseline figures and account structure. more
The measurement window ran FY24 Q3, thirteen weeks over a sample of 170,560. That sample size is on the page because a baseline drawn from twelve cases and one drawn from forty thousand are not the same instrument, and averaging them into a single confidence figure would hide which one you are looking at.
4 of 5 cash lines resting on this baseline carry a journal reference. A benefit line with no journal reference has not touched the general ledger, so it is shown as claimed rather than counted as realized cash.