LensReading which lens this session carries.

Prove · baseline BL-056

Portfolio Analytics

Portfolio Analytics, all regions, as run before the agents were switched on. Owner at the time of measurement: Director, R&D Analytics.

Baseline register
Status
Locked and signed
confidence 0.81
Cost per unit
$1796.27
2,249 units in the window
Cycle time
8.3 days
pre-agent, measured end to end
Quality
94.1%
rework rate, inverted
Claimed on this baseline
$9.09m
$3.93m independently verified
Posted to the ledger
3 of 5
cash lines with a journal reference

How it was measured

Time and motion

Method
Time and motion
Method note
Observed task timing on a case sample, extrapolated to the population. Extrapolation error is carried, not removed.
Window
FY25 Q2, eight weeks, shortened
Sample
157
Confidence in the method
0.81

Sign-off

Who accepted this as the number to beat

Status
Locked and signed
Signed by
Helena Marsh
Role
VP Financial Planning and Analysis
Signed
13.3 months ago
Caveat carried with the number
Locked and signed, but the method carries extrapolation error that is not removed. Treat the figure as a range, not a point.

Where the benefit lands

Account and cost center this baseline reconciles to

General ledger account
6500 · Outsourced services, shared centers
Managed-service fees for the shared towers. Volume-priced, so a throughput change moves this account within one billing cycle.
Corporate GL · Third party · owner Sofia Lindqvist, Finance Business Partner, Operations
Cost center
CC-3020 · Research and Development
Global · owner Daniel Okoye · annual budget $47.06m
Research & Developmentfunction viewEV-BL-056evidence chain

Benefit lines resting on this baseline

5 lines · $9.09m claimed · $7.23m realized · $3.93m verified

PeriodCategoryClaimedRealizedVerifiedStatusVarianceJournal
FY25 Q3Outsourced cost$1.17m$1.21mnot verifiedNot verified
Scope
Scope drifted after the baseline was signed. The added work is real but it is not this baseline.
not posted
FY25 Q4Outsourced cost$1.70m$1.43m$1.34mPartly verified
Method mismatch
The baseline was measured by survey and the realized figure by system extract. The two are not comparable without a bridge, and no bridge has been built.
JV-2025Q4-0111
FY26 Q1Outsourced cost$2.17m$1.54m$1.28mPartly verified
Rate
The blended labor rate used in the claim sits above the rate actually charged to the cost center.
JV-2026Q1-0112
FY26 Q2Outsourced cost$2.59m$1.63m$1.31mPartly verified
Volume
Seasonal volume ran ahead of baseline, which flatters the realized figure rather than the claim.
JV-2026Q2-0113
FY26 Q3Outsourced cost$1.45m$1.42mnot verifiedPeriod open
Period open
The period is not closed. The realized figure is a run rate, not a result, and nothing in it has been verified.
not posted
What this record is, and what it is not

A benefit realization ledger reconciled to a general ledger needs the customer’s actual baseline figures and account structure. Modeled numbers demonstrate the instrument and prove nothing about the business case.

The measurement window ran FY25 Q2, eight weeks, shortened over a sample of 157. That sample size is on the page because a baseline drawn from twelve cases and one drawn from forty thousand are not the same instrument, and averaging them into a single confidence figure would hide which one you are looking at.

3 of 5 cash lines resting on this baseline carry a journal reference. A benefit line with no journal reference has not touched the general ledger, so it is shown as claimed rather than counted as realized cash.